[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ_Uc5UqCFojUYioXYJycbcBCF-nGryJiTMkhkN5MJhpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:18:32 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 06/11] dt-bindings: timer: Update SiFive CLINT
bindings for IPI support
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 7:00 AM Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 6:59 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:47:24AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > The Linux RISC-V now treats IPIs as regular per-CPU IRQs. This means
> > > we have to create a IPI interrupt domain to use CLINT IPI functionality
> > > hence requiring a "interrupt-controller" and "#interrupt-cells" DT
> > > property in CLINT DT nodes.
> > >
> > > Impact of this CLINT DT bindings change only affects Linux RISC-V
> > > NoMMU kernel and has no effect of existing M-mode runtime firmwares
> > > (i.e. OpenSBI).
> >
> > It appears to me you should fix Linux to not need these 2 useless
> > properties. I say useless because #interrupt-cells being 0 is pretty
> > useless.
>
> Linux IRQCHIP framework only probes IRQCHIP DT nodes which
> have "interrupt-controller" DT property.
Right, I believe I wrote that... So what would it look like to fix
that? The simplest thing is just drop the check for
'interrupt-controller'. That's just a sanity check and we have other
ways to do that now (schemas). Do you need this early? You can always
implement your own initcall.
> The "interrupt-cells" DT property
> can be removed because as an interrupt controller SiFive CLINT
> will only provide IPIs to arch code.
The schema will disagree.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists