[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210902075339.GD303522@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:53:39 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
mike.leach@...aro.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] perf cs-etm: Show a warning for an unknown magic
number
Hi Arnaldo,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:49:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
> This doesn't explain that 'make -C tools/perf build-test' error, perhaps
> it is reusing the feature dump (feature detection), done without
> CORESIGHT=1, when building with CORESIGHT=1 :-\
>
> Anyway, please consider making the build fail when CORESIGHT=1 is passed
> explicitely and that tools/build/feature-libopencsd.c feature test fails
> instead of silently building the tool _without_ the explicitely asked
> for feature.
Sorry for inconvenience.
I have sent a patch to allow the build to report error when detect feature
failure for libopencsd [1].
It's obviously that there have another issue with 'make -C tools/perf
build-test' which should not build with option 'CORESIGHT=1' by
default. Please let me know if you want me to follow this issue or not.
Thanks,
Leo
[1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-September/006967.html
p.s. I didn't use the patch linkage from lore.kernel.org, seems
the server is down when I try to fetch link from it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists