[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTCV7HbeoaD6rJP5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:14:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] x86/entry: Expose the address of .Lgs_change to
traps.c
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:50:05AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index e38a4cf795d9..9164e85b36b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ _ASM_NOKPROBE(common_interrupt_return)
> SYM_FUNC_START(asm_load_gs_index)
> FRAME_BEGIN
> swapgs
> +SYM_INNER_LABEL(asm_load_gs_index_gs_change, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
> .Lgs_change:
After all the patches, there's only a single .Lgs_change reference left.
Can't we convert the _ASM_EXTABLE() entry to use the new label and
totally remove it?
> movl %edi, %gs
> 2: ALTERNATIVE "", "mfence", X86_BUG_SWAPGS_FENCE
> @@ -1011,7 +1012,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
> movl %ecx, %eax /* zero extend */
> cmpq %rax, RIP+8(%rsp)
> je .Lbstep_iret
> - cmpq $.Lgs_change, RIP+8(%rsp)
> + cmpq $asm_load_gs_index_gs_change, RIP+8(%rsp)
> jne .Lerror_entry_done_lfence
Powered by blists - more mailing lists