[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTC1ANx81eQeGN4o@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:26:56 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:07:39AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The SNP firmware spec says that counter must begin with the 1.
So put that in the comment and explain what 0 is: magic or invalid or
whatnot and why is that so and that it is spec-ed this way, etc.
Just having it there without a reasoning makes one wonder whether that's
some arbitrary limitation or so.
> During the GHCB writing the seqno use to be 32-bit value and hence the GHCB
> spec choose the 32-bit value but recently the SNP firmware changed it from
> the 32 to 64. So, now we are left with the option of limiting the sequence
> number to 32-bit. If we go beyond 32-bit then all we can do is fail the
> call. If we pass the value of zero then FW will fail the call.
That sounds weird again. So make it 64-bit like the FW and fix the spec.
> I just choose the smaller name but I have no issues matching with the spec.
> Also those keys does not have anything to do with the VMPL level. The
> secrets page provides 4 different keys and they are referred as vmpck0..3
> and each of them have a sequence numbers associated with it.
>
> In GHCB v3 we probably need to rework the structure name.
You can point to the spec section so that readers can find the struct
layout there.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists