[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22b20ed0-f3d1-c70c-1f3d-ca897330f7c6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 08:56:06 -0300
From: Igor Matheus Andrade Torrente <igormtorrente@...il.com>
To: Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>
Cc: rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com, melissa.srw@...il.com,
hamohammed.sa@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VKMS: New plane formats
On 9/1/21 5:24 PM, Simon Ser wrote:
> Ideally the final composition format would have enough precision for
> all of the planes. I think it'd make sense to use ARGB16161616 if the
> primary plane uses ARGB8888 and an overlay plane uses ARGB16161616.
>
> To simplify the code, maybe it's fine to always use ARGB16161616 for
> the output, and add getters which fetch an ARGB16161616 row for each
> supported plane format.
>
This makes sense to me. I will try to implement this way.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists