[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTC+FTo4uLLdyBxA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:05:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/24] x86/traps: Move arch/x86/kernel/traps.c to
arch/x86/entry/
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 07:54:25PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> For example, stack-protector is instrumenting many noninstr functions now
> if the CONFIG is yes. It is normally Ok and gcc is adding per-function control
> on it.
IIRC the latest compiler have an attribute for this too, that really
should be added to noinstr. Lemme go find.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists