[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTDDvnvslnjjok2H@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:29:50 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] x86/entry: Implement and use do_paranoid_entry()
and paranoid_exit()
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 07:58:51PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Oh, #VC will need to switch stack. I think we need ASM code to switch
> stack since the original stack need to be "free" for next #VC.
Right, #VC switches off its IST stack to make it free for subsequent
#VCs. The switch mostly happens in C code already, see
vc_switch_off_ist(), only the actual RSP update is still ASM.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists