linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:37:12 -0700
From:   Benjamin Li <benl@...areup.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication

On 9/2/21 9:37 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Benjamin Li <benl@...areup.com> writes:
> 
>> Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone
>> away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles
>> AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@...areup.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
> 
> How well is this tested? I'm pondering should I queue this to v5.15 or
> v5.16, at the moment I'm leaning towards v5.16.
>
It was an issue reported during internal testing, and the patch has not
yet had soak time with our quality team/field devices. v5.16 sounds fine.

Ben