[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210902190400.5257-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:04:00 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
syzbot+b2be9dd8ca6f6c73ee2d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] net: xfrm: fix shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_get_default
Syzbot hit shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_get_default. The problem was in
missing validation check for user data.
up->dirmask comes from user-space, so we need to check if this value
is less than XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX to avoid shift-out-of-bounds bugs.
Fixes: 2d151d39073a ("xfrm: Add possibility to set the default to block if we have no policy")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b2be9dd8ca6f6c73ee2d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index b7b986520dc7..e4cf48c71315 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2005,6 +2005,11 @@ static int xfrm_get_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
+ if (up->dirmask >= XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX) {
+ kfree_skb(r_skb);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
r_up = nlmsg_data(r_nlh);
r_up->action = ((net->xfrm.policy_default & (1 << up->dirmask)) >> up->dirmask);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists