[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de23e803-3840-501e-87a8-39eed7ba434b@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:17:25 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        leo.yan@...aro.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mike.leach@...aro.org
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] perf cs-etm: Print the decoder name
On 06/08/2021 14:41, James Clark wrote:
> Use the real name of the decoder instead of hard-coding "ETM" to avoid
> confusion when the trace is ETE. This also now distinguishes between
> ETMv3 and ETMv4.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
