[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTIZpijSZc+ykNUY@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:48:38 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: do not sleep in ext2_error()
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:05:38PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> No one expects error logging functions to sleep so sometimes they are
> called with spinlocks held. In this case the problematic call tree is:
>
> ext2_statfs() <- disables preempt
> -> ext2_count_free_inodes()
> -> ext2_get_group_desc()
> -> ext2_error()
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> This is just from static analysis. NOT TESTED!
>
> Probably a safer fix would be to just call pr_err() instead of
> ext2_error() in ext2_get_group_desc(). I can send that fix instead if
> people want.
Looking at both of the ext2_error() calls in ext2_get_group_desc(),
those are really more in the way of assertions rather than warning of
an on-disk corruption issue. The second "group descriptor not loaded"
should never happen, and the "block_group >= groups_count" should have
been caught via an invalid block number or check by the caller (or an
outright code bug in say ext2_statfs().
So I suspect both of those would be more usefule as a WARN() rather
than a call to ext2_error(), since stack trace would actually provide
more useful data to root causing the issue. Jan, what do you think?
- Ted
P.S. The same analysis applies for ext4_get_group_desc(), BTW. We
don't take a lock in ext4_statfs() so trying to take a lock while
sleeping is not an issue.
For both ext2 and ext4, the caller is not supposed to holding spin
locks when it calls ext[24]_error(). In cases where it is absolutely
not avoidable, special measures are required --- see for example
__ext4_grp_locked_error().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists