linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] libata: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 08:05:54 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Kate Hsuan <hpa@...hat.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Cc:     linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] libata: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI for Samsung 860
 and 870 SSD.

On 9/3/21 8:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 9/3/21 2:35 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/3/21 3:44 AM, Kate Hsuan wrote:
>>> Many users are reporting that the Samsung 860 and 870 SSD are having
>>> various issues when combined with AMD/ATI (vendor ID 0x1002)  SATA
>>> controllers and only completely disabling NCQ helps to avoid these
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Always disabling NCQ for Samsung 860/870 SSDs regardless of the host
>>> SATA adapter vendor will cause I/O performance degradation with well
>>> behaved adapters. To limit the performance impact to ATI adapters,
>>> introduce the ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI flag to force disable NCQ
>>> only for these adapters.
>>>
>>> Also, two libata.force parameters (noncqati and ncqati) are introduced
>>> to disable and enable the NCQ for the system which equipped with ATI
>>> SATA adapter and Samsung 860 and 870 SSDs. The user can determine NCQ
>>> function to be enabled or disabled according to the demand.
>>>
>>> After verifying the chipset from the user reports, the issue appears
>>> on AMD/ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controllers and does not appear on
>>> recent AMD SATA adapters. The vendor ID of ATI should be 0x1002.
>>> Therefore, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_AMD was modified to
>>> ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI.
>>
>> What's this patch against?
> 
> linux-block/for-next + my pre-cursor patch from here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20210823095220.30157-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/T/#u

Still had to fixup a hunk, but it was trivial. In any case, I've applied
both now, thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe