[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210903185850.GY22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 19:58:50 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] Make the PHY library stop being so
greedy when binding the generic PHY driver
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 07:21:19PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Russell
>
> Do you have
>
> auto brdsl
>
> in your /etc/network/interfaces?
>
> Looking at /lib/udev/bridge-network-interface it seems it will only do
> hotplug of interfaces if auto is set on the bridge interface. Without
> auto, it only does coldplug. So late appearing switch ports won't get
> added.
I think you're looking at this:
[ "$BRIDGE_HOTPLUG" = "no" ] && exit 0
?
Just before that is:
[ -f /etc/default/bridge-utils ] && . /etc/default/bridge-utils
and /etc/default/bridge-utils sets BRIDGE_HOTPLUG, which is by
default:
# Shoud we add the ports of a bridge to the bridge when they are
# hotplugged?
BRIDGE_HOTPLUG=no
and... none of this seems documented. Not in
/usr/share/doc/bridge-utils/README.Debian and not in the
bridge-utils-interfaces(5) man page. This is all a bit rubbish,
really.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists