[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210903163047.20e4f286@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 16:30:47 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
Cc: surenb@...gle.com, hridya@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
john.reitan@....com, orjan.eide@....com, mark.underwood@....com,
gary.sweet@...adcom.com, stephen.mansfield@...tec.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] tracing/gpu: Add imported size to gpu_mem_imported
tracepoint
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:02:29 +0000
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> The existing gpu_mem_total tracepoint provides GPU drivers a uniform way
> to report the per-process and system-wide GPU memory usage. This
> tracepoint reports a single total of the GPU private allocations and the
> imported memory. [1]
>
> To allow distinguishing GPU private vs imported memory, add an
> imported_size field to the gpu_mem_total tracepoint. GPU drivers can use
> this new field to report the per-process and global GPU-imported memory
> in a uniform way.
>
> User space tools can detect and handle the old vs new gpu_mem_total
> format via the gpu_mem/gpu_mem_total/format file.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200302234840.57188-1-zzyiwei@google.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/gpu_mem.h | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
This is that trace event that doesn't have any in tree callers, right? I
thought there was going to be some soon.
For the updates to the tracing side (besides not having any users), it
looks trivial to me.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
But this needs to be pulled in by one of the GPU maintainers.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists