[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202109031439.B58932AF0@keescook>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:47:01 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ccross@...gle.com,
sumit.semwal@...aro.org, mhocko@...e.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
willy@...radead.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, corbet@....net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, rdunlap@...radead.org,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com, rppt@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com, chinwen.chang@...iatek.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, aarcange@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
apopple@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
will@...nel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
hughd@...gle.com, feng.tang@...el.com, jgg@...pe.ca, guro@...com,
tglx@...utronix.de, krisman@...labora.com, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
pcc@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
legion@...nel.org, eb@...ix.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
thomascedeno@...gle.com, sashal@...nel.org, cxfcosmos@...il.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] mm: add a field to store names for private
anonymous memory
(Sorry, a few more things jumped out at me when I looked again...)
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> [...]
> diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> index 72c7639e3c98..25118902a376 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -2299,6 +2299,64 @@ int __weak arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long which,
>
> #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +
> +#define ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN 256
> +
> +static inline bool is_valid_name_char(char ch)
> +{
> + /* printable ascii characters, except [ \ ] */
> + return (ch > 0x1f && ch < 0x5b) || (ch > 0x5d && ch < 0x7f);
> +}
In the back of my mind, I feel like disallowing backtick would be nice,
but then if $, (, and ) are allowed, it doesn't matter, and that seems
too limiting. :)
> +
> +static int prctl_set_vma(unsigned long opt, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long size, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + const char __user *uname;
> + char *name, *pch;
> + int error;
> +
> + switch (opt) {
> + case PR_SET_VMA_ANON_NAME:
> + uname = (const char __user *)arg;
> + if (!uname) {
> + /* Reset the name */
> + name = NULL;
> + goto set_name;
> + }
> +
> + name = strndup_user(uname, ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(name))
> + return PTR_ERR(name);
> +
> + for (pch = name; *pch != '\0'; pch++) {
> + if (!is_valid_name_char(*pch)) {
> + kfree(name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +set_name:
> + mmap_write_lock(mm);
> + error = madvise_set_anon_name(mm, addr, size, name);
> + mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> + kfree(name);
> + break;
This is a weird construct with a needless goto. Why not:
switch (opt) {
case PR_SET_VMA_ANON_NAME:
uname = (const char __user *)arg;
if (uname) {
name = strndup_user(uname, ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN);
if (IS_ERR(name))
return PTR_ERR(name);
for (pch = name; *pch != '\0'; pch++) {
if (!is_valid_name_char(*pch)) {
kfree(name);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
} else {
/* Reset the name */
name = NULL;
}
mmap_write_lock(mm);
error = madvise_set_anon_name(mm, addr, size, name);
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
kfree(name);
break;
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists