lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202109031522.ACDF5BA8@keescook>
Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 15:28:22 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        vincenzo.frascino@....com,
        Chinwen Chang (張錦文) 
        <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, apopple@...dia.com,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, feng.tang@...el.com,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, krisman@...labora.com,
        chris.hyser@...cle.com, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, legion@...nel.org,
        Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Cedeno <thomascedeno@...gle.com>, sashal@...nel.org,
        cxfcosmos@...il.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] mm: add a field to store names for private
 anonymous memory

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:56:21PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:47 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > (Sorry, a few more things jumped out at me when I looked again...)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 04:18:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> > > index 72c7639e3c98..25118902a376 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sys.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> > > @@ -2299,6 +2299,64 @@ int __weak arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long which,
> > >
> > >  #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE)
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > > +
> > > +#define ANON_VMA_NAME_MAX_LEN        256
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool is_valid_name_char(char ch)
> > > +{
> > > +     /* printable ascii characters, except [ \ ] */
> > > +     return (ch > 0x1f && ch < 0x5b) || (ch > 0x5d && ch < 0x7f);
> > > +}
> >
> > In the back of my mind, I feel like disallowing backtick would be nice,
> > but then if $, (, and ) are allowed, it doesn't matter, and that seems
> > too limiting. :)
> 
> It's not used by the only current user (Android) and we can always
> allow more chars later. However going the other direction and
> disallowing some of them I think would be harder (need to make sure
> nobody uses them). WDYT if we keep it stricter and relax if needed?

I'd say, if we can also drop each of: ` $ ( )
then let's do it. Better to keep the obvious shell meta-characters out
of this, although I don't feel strongly about it. Anything that might
get confused by this would be similarly confused by binary names too:

$ cat /proc/3407216/maps
560bdafd4000-560bdafd6000 r--p 00000000 fd:02 2621909 /tmp/yay`wat

And it's probably easier to change a binary name than to call prctl. :P

I'm good either way. What you have now is great, but if we wanted to be
extra extra strict, we can add the other 4 above.

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ