linux-kernel - [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Add TRAILING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210904074201.13532-1-utkarshverma294@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat,  4 Sep 2021 13:12:01 +0530
From:   Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
To:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
Cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: checkpatch: Add TRAILING_SEMICOLON message

Add a new message type TRAILING_SEMICOLON for the macro definitions
that conclude with a semicolon.

Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <utkarshverma294@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
index f0956e9ea2d8..30eda8f4a8bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
@@ -845,6 +845,27 @@ Macros, Attributes and Symbols
     Use the `fallthrough;` pseudo keyword instead of
     `/* fallthrough */` like comments.
 
+  **TRAILING_SEMICOLON**
+    Macro definition should not end with a semicolon. The macro
+    invocation style should be consistent with function calls.
+    This can prevent any unexpected code paths::
+
+      #define MAC do_something;
+
+    If this macro is used within a if else statement, like::
+
+      if (some_condition)
+              MAC;
+
+      else
+              do_something;
+
+    Then there would be a compilation error, because when the macro is
+    expanded there are two trailing semicolons, so the else branch gets
+    orphaned.
+
+    See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1399671106.2912.21.camel@joe-AO725/
+
   **WEAK_DECLARATION**
     Using weak declarations like __attribute__((weak)) or __weak
     can have unintended link defects.  Avoid using them.
-- 
2.25.1