linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] Kbuild updates for v5.15-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 04 Sep 2021 10:01:07 +0200
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Kbuild updates for v5.15-rc1

* Nathan Chancellor:

> We set up the linux-toolchains mailing list after Plumbers 2020 to
> have a common place that kernel developers can bring issues and
> discussion to both clang and GCC folks. I am not sure who exactly from
> the GCC world is subscribed but I have added it now to see.

Someone said that they “agree with the reasoning”, but the original
patch does not provide one.  It looks like it's about preventing the use
of compiler-supplied header files, but even that doesn't really answer
the question: why?

Especially since some parts of the kernel actually need some of those
header files.

Thanks,
Florian