linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 07/33] mm, slub: dissolve new_slab_objects() into ___slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210904105003.11688-8-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date:   Sat,  4 Sep 2021 12:49:37 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v6 07/33] mm, slub: dissolve new_slab_objects() into ___slab_alloc()

The later patches will need more fine grained control over individual actions
in ___slab_alloc(), the only caller of new_slab_objects(), so dissolve it
there. This is a preparatory step with no functional change.

The only minor change is moving WARN_ON_ONCE() for using a constructor together
with __GFP_ZERO to new_slab(), which makes it somewhat less frequent, but still
able to catch a development change introducing a systematic misuse.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
 mm/slub.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index cd6aeeec4417..0c645b0e96d9 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,8 @@ static struct page *new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 	if (unlikely(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK))
 		flags = kmalloc_fix_flags(flags);
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(s->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
+
 	return allocate_slab(s,
 		flags & (GFP_RECLAIM_MASK | GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK), node);
 }
@@ -2610,36 +2612,6 @@ slab_out_of_memory(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int nid)
 #endif
 }
 
-static inline void *new_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
-			int node, struct kmem_cache_cpu **pc)
-{
-	void *freelist = NULL;
-	struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = *pc;
-	struct page *page;
-
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(s->ctor && (flags & __GFP_ZERO));
-
-	page = new_slab(s, flags, node);
-	if (page) {
-		c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
-		if (c->page)
-			flush_slab(s, c);
-
-		/*
-		 * No other reference to the page yet so we can
-		 * muck around with it freely without cmpxchg
-		 */
-		freelist = page->freelist;
-		page->freelist = NULL;
-
-		stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
-		c->page = page;
-		*pc = c;
-	}
-
-	return freelist;
-}
-
 static inline bool pfmemalloc_match(struct page *page, gfp_t gfpflags)
 {
 	if (unlikely(PageSlabPfmemalloc(page)))
@@ -2786,13 +2758,27 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags, int node,
 	if (freelist)
 		goto check_new_page;
 
-	freelist = new_slab_objects(s, gfpflags, node, &c);
+	page = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node);
 
-	if (unlikely(!freelist)) {
+	if (unlikely(!page)) {
 		slab_out_of_memory(s, gfpflags, node);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
+	c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+	if (c->page)
+		flush_slab(s, c);
+
+	/*
+	 * No other reference to the page yet so we can
+	 * muck around with it freely without cmpxchg
+	 */
+	freelist = page->freelist;
+	page->freelist = NULL;
+
+	stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
+	c->page = page;
+
 check_new_page:
 	page = c->page;
 	if (likely(!kmem_cache_debug(s) && pfmemalloc_match(page, gfpflags)))
-- 
2.33.0