[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8ANSR49juFDvPxHECKv7-uSowjdxruqnb=z6vu_CEkujjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 10:58:31 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add fsl,imx-dsp-rproc
binding document
Hi Rob
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 12:50 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:42 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:29:36 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > Define the compatible string and properties needed by imx_dsp_rproc
> > > driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
> > > ---
> > > .../remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml
> > >
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> I take that back. What's the difference with this binding and
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml?
Some devices, but two kinds of driver. one for remoteproc
framework, another one is for ALSA.
So should I merge fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml to fsl,dsp.yaml?
Best regards
Wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists