[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210905154737.6c41bae0@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 15:47:36 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
Cc: <lars@...afoo.de>, <pmeerw@...erw.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<joel@....id.au>, <andrew@...id.au>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [v5 11/15] iio: adc: aspeed: Fix the calculate error of clock.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:14:54 +0800
Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com> wrote:
> The ADC clock formula is
> ast2400/2500:
> ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> ast2600:
> ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> They all have one fixed divided 2 and the legacy driver didn't handle it.
> This patch register the fixed factory clock device as the parent of ADC
> clock scaler to fix this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> index 40b7ba58c1dc..349377b9fac0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2017 Google, Inc.
> * Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> + *
> + * ADC clock formula:
> + * Ast2400/Ast2500:
> + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> + * Ast2600:
> + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> */
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> @@ -85,6 +91,7 @@ struct aspeed_adc_data {
> struct regulator *regulator;
> void __iomem *base;
> spinlock_t clk_lock;
> + struct clk_hw *fixed_div_clk;
> struct clk_hw *clk_prescaler;
> struct clk_hw *clk_scaler;
> struct reset_control *rst;
> @@ -204,6 +211,13 @@ static void aspeed_adc_unregister_divider(void *data)
> clk_hw_unregister_divider(clk);
> }
>
> +static void aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider(void *data)
> +{
> + struct clk_hw *clk = data;
> +
> + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_factor(clk);
> +}
> +
> static void aspeed_adc_reset_assert(void *data)
> {
> struct reset_control *rst = data;
> @@ -328,6 +342,19 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> spin_lock_init(&data->clk_lock);
> snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), "%s",
> of_clk_get_parent_name(pdev->dev.of_node, 0));
> + snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-fixed-div",
> + data->model_data->model_name);
> + data->fixed_div_clk = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(
> + &pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent_name, 0, 1, 2);
Obvious follow on from Philipp's review - there is a devm_ version of
this as well which you can use rather than rolling a custom version.
As a side note, I'm fairly sure you could refactor all those devm_clk_hw
functions to use devm_add_action_or_reset() internally and simplify that
code nicely.
A recent series did the same for all the similar functions in IIO.
> + if (IS_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk);
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(data->dev,
> + aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider,
> + data->clk_prescaler);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), clk_name);
>
> if (data->model_data->need_prescaler) {
> snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-prescaler",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists