linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL v2] Kbuild updates for v5.15-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210906215218.GA920497@tucnak>
Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 23:52:18 +0200
From:   Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Kbuild updates for v5.15-rc1

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:08:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > the only guaranteed APIs are
> > those provided by the headers (x86intrin.h/*mmintrin.h etc. on x86,
> > arm_{neon,sve}.h etc. on arm*, ...)
> 
> You guys realize we don't use those, do you?

The x86intrin.h/*mmintrin.h on x86 indeed not, arm_neon.h is used in the
kernel:
arch/arm64/include/asm/neon-intrinsics.h:#include <arm_neon.h>
arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c:#include <asm/neon-intrinsics.h>
The arm intrinsics headers are similar to the x86 ones in that the only
supported APIs are the ones provided by the headers, the underlying builtins
can change.

> That "immintrin.h" file, for example, is simply not usable for the
> kernel. I just checked.
> 
> Why? Because it ends up doing exactly all those things that MUST NOT
> be done for the kernel.
> 
>    In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/include/xmmintrin.h:34,
>                     from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/include/immintrin.h:31,
>                     from t.c:1:
>    /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/include/mm_malloc.h:27:10:
> fatal error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory
>       27 | #include <stdlib.h>
>          |          ^~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Oops.

It is actually not that bad, stdlib.h is indeed included there because of 2
intrinsics out of more than 5000 and when one doesn't need those, just
#define _MM_MALLOC_H_INCLUDED
#include <x86intrin.h>
will get rid of the stdlib.h include and those 2 APIs that wouldn't be
usable in the kernel anyway.  There is a stddef.h include too and that's it
(I must say I don't see the reason for that include though).

Other compiler provided headers (not talking about C++ now) also have no
or very limited includes, including stddef.h, stdarg.h, stdatomic.h, etc.
The only exceptions are tgmath.h which isn't usable without libc
math.h/complex.h, in some cases stdint.h and limits.h which are in some
configurations provided both by the C library and the compiler and include
each other in that case (but e.g. stdint.h has an alternate version that
only uses compiler provided builtin macros) and openacc.h.

Sure, the glibc headers are a different thing.

	Jakub