[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y28aii58.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 09:53:39 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
<feng.tang@...el.com>, <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<mm-commits@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [mm/migrate] 9eeb73028c: stress-ng.memhotplug.ops_per_sec
-53.8% regression
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> writes:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -53.8% regression of stress-ng.memhotplug.ops_per_sec due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 9eeb73028cfb54eb06efe87c50cc014d3f1ff43e ("[patch 174/212] mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrew-Morton/ia64-fix-typo-in-a-comment/20210903-065028
>
>
> in testcase: stress-ng
> on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 192G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> nr_threads: 10%
> disk: 1HDD
> testtime: 60s
> fs: ext4
> class: os
> test: memhotplug
> cpufreq_governor: performance
> ucode: 0x5003006
>
Because we added some operations during online/offline CPU, it's
expected that the performance of online/offline CPU will decrease. In
most cases, the performance of CPU hotplug isn't a big problem. But
then I remembers that the performance of the CPU hotplug may influence
suspend/resume performance :-(
It appears that it is easy and reasonable to enclose the added
operations inside #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA. Is this sufficient to restore the
performance of suspend/resume?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists