linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc6E_ZJxGn_qjY5kr3QSCjMmhdddUNJSZwpbkF2-ShF+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:47:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: add sloppy logic analyzer using polling

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:38 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> > Any reason you are not cc’ing me? ;)
>
> Yes, your reviews are too strict ;)

Ha-ha!

> No, seriously, since you always
> responded to the patchset anyhow, I didn't see a need.

Thanks to AI behind Gmail :-)
I would appreciate if you Cc me explicitly.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko