linux-kernel - Re: kernel/kexec_file.o: failed: Cannot find symbol for section 10: .text.unlikely.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:09:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: kernel/kexec_file.o: failed: Cannot find symbol for section 10:
 .text.unlikely.

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 01:10:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 20:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:28:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Following build errors noticed while building stable rc Linux 5.13.14
> > > with gcc-11 for powerpc architecture.
> 
> <trim>
> > Is this a regression?  Has this compiler ever been able to build this
> > arch like this?
> 
> Yes. It is a regression with gcc-11.
> 
> stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-11 - powerpc - FAILED
> stable rc Linux 5.13.14 with gcc-10 - powerpc - PASSED

Ah, ok, and does 5.14 or newer work properly?

thanks,

greg k-h