[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTXTe3U8RrvSAynl@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:38:19 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: minchan@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ytk.lee@...sung.com,
jaewon31.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram_drv: allow reclaim on bio_alloc
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:26PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> The read_from_bdev_async is not called on atomic context. So GFP_NOIO is
> available rather than GFP_ATOMIC. If there were reclaimable pages with
> GFP_NOIO, we can avoid allocation failure and page fault failure.
>
> Reported-by: Yong-Taek Lee <ytk.lee@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index fcaf2750f68f..53be528a39a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int read_from_bdev_async(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
> {
> struct bio *bio;
>
> - bio = bio_alloc(GFP_ATOMIC, 1);
> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_HIGHMEM, 1);
Passing __GFP_HIGHMEM to bio_alloc does not make any sense whatsoever.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists