[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR03MB6355578764364F98D3FF163A99D29@SA1PR03MB6355.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:38:02 +0000
From: "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 14/16] iio: adc: max1027: Don't just sleep when the EOC
interrupt is available
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 11:15 PM
> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> <lars@...afoo.de>; linux-iio@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>; Sa, Nuno
> <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>; Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 14/16] iio: adc: max1027: Don't just sleep when the
> EOC interrupt is available
>
> [External]
>
> The interrupt will fire upon end of conversion. This currently can
> happen in two situations: either the cnvst trigger was enabled and
> toggled, or a single read was requested and the data is ready. The first
> situation is already covered while the second is not. Instead, a waiting
> delay is applied. Let's handle these interrupts more properly by adding
> second path in our EOC helper.
>
> Rename the interrupt handler to a more generic name as it won't only
> handle triggered situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> index b85fe0a48ff9..e734d32a5507 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1027.c
> @@ -256,15 +256,27 @@ struct max1027_state {
> struct iio_trigger *trig;
> __be16 *buffer;
> struct mutex lock;
> + struct completion complete;
>
> u8 reg ____cacheline_aligned;
> };
>
> static int max1027_wait_eoc(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> + struct max1027_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> unsigned int conversion_time =
> MAX1027_CONVERSION_UDELAY;
> + int ret;
>
> - usleep_range(conversion_time, conversion_time * 2);
> + if (st->spi->irq) {
> + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&st->complete,
> +
> msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> + if (!ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + reinit_completion(&st->complete);
I would call this before the waiting...
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists