linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Sep 2021 11:40:29 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     vbabka@...e.cz, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: don't putback unisolated page

On 04.09.21 11:18, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> If __isolate_free_page() failed, due to zone watermark check, the page is
> still on the free list. But this page will be put back to free list again
> via __putback_isolated_page() now. This may trigger page->flags checks in
> __free_one_page() if PageReported is set. Or we will corrupt the free list
> because list_add() will be called for pages already on another list.
> 
> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
>   mm/page_isolation.c | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 9bb562d5d194..7d70d772525c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ static void unset_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, unsigned migratetype)
>   			buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, order);
>   			buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn);
>   
> -			if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy)) {
> -				__isolate_free_page(page, order);
> -				isolated_page = true;
> -			}
> +			if (!is_migrate_isolate_page(buddy))
> +				isolated_page = !!__isolate_free_page(page, order);
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> 

Shouldn't we much rather force to ignore watermarks here and make sure 
__isolate_free_page() never fails?

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb