[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210906134438.14250-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:44:38 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@...il.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] ksmbd: add missing assignments to ret on ndr_read_int64 read calls
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently there are two ndr_read_int64 calls where ret is being checked
for failure but ret is not being assigned a return value from the call.
Static analyis is reporting the checks on ret as dead code. Fix this.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Logical dead code")
Fixes: 303fff2b8c77 ("ksmbd: add validation for ndr read/write functions")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
fs/ksmbd/ndr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c b/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c
index a476de291f62..8317f7ca402b 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/ndr.c
@@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ int ndr_decode_dos_attr(struct ndr *n, struct xattr_dos_attrib *da)
if (ret)
return ret;
- ndr_read_int64(n, NULL);
+ ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ndr_read_int64(n, NULL);
+ ret = ndr_read_int64(n, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists