[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTYnHUYSfB6YElnh@osiris>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 16:35:09 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, chaitanya.kulkarni@....com,
atulgopinathan@...il.com, hare@...e.de, maximlevitsky@...il.com,
oakad@...oo.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org, colin.king@...onical.com,
shubhankarvk@...il.com, baijiaju1990@...il.com, trix@...hat.com,
dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] s390/block/xpram: add error handling support for
add_disk()
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:15:40AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if
> > we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:
>
> I'm all for removing it. I think we need to do a little more spring
> cleaning on unmaintained and likely to be unused block drivers.
Yes, we'll remove it. I'll schedule it even for this merge
window. Should be away with -rc1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists