linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/rockchip: cdn-dp-core: Fix cdn_dp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:17:32 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/rockchip: cdn-dp-core: Fix cdn_dp_resume
 unused warning

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:02 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:58 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
> > From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>

> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >  static int cdn_dp_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> An alternative solution would be to tag the function with
> __maybe_unused.

Right. In this case, both are correct, but generally speaking I tend to use the
__maybe_unused variant because it's more reliable at fixing the warning for
good when there are additional functions called by the suspend/resume
helpers that now become unused in some configurations, or when you pick
the wrong set of #ifdefs.

Having fewer #ifdef checks also helps with build coverage testing when there
is a warning inside of an #ifdef.

       Arnd