[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210907103458.l2iyvjps5bjwnzng@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:34:58 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended()
rt_rwlock_is_contended() has not users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and preemption
is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and even if
there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if the
current owner has the highest priority.
Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Fixes: 8282947f67345 ("locking/rwlock: Provide RT variant")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -246,12 +246,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *r
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
-int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
-{
- return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists