[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210907034038.ncx5nas6mhrk4u3r@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:10:38 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: domains: Add a ->dev_get_performance_state()
callback to genpd
On 06-09-21, 17:35, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Viresh, are you okay with going back to the variant with the
> dev_pm_opp_sync() helper?
I have missed a lot of stuff in between and wasn't following this
carefully as I thought my half was resolved :)
Can you describe what to propose to do again ? From what I remember,
doing this one time from probe() is okay, doing it from
suspend/resume, not so much.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists