linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 3/6] nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210907140154.2134091-4-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 22:01:51 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To:     <axboe@...nel.dk>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC:     <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <nbd@...er.debian.org>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message

While handling a response message from server, nbd_read_stat() will
try to get request by tag, and then complete the request. However,
this is problematic if nbd haven't sent a corresponding request
message:

t1                      t2
                        submit_bio
                         nbd_queue_rq
                          blk_mq_start_request
recv_work
 nbd_read_stat
  blk_mq_find_and_get_req
 blk_mq_complete_request
                          nbd_send_cmd

Thus add a new cmd flag 'NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT', it will be set in
nbd_send_cmd() and checked in nbd_read_stat().

Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/block/nbd.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index 920da390635c..521a8d913741 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ struct nbd_device {
 };
 
 #define NBD_CMD_REQUEUED	1
+/*
+ * This flag will be set if nbd_queue_rq() succeed, and will be checked and
+ * cleared in completion. Both setting and clearing of the flag are protected
+ * by cmd->lock.
+ */
+#define NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT	2
 
 struct nbd_cmd {
 	struct nbd_device *nbd;
@@ -400,6 +406,7 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nbd_xmit_timeout(struct request *req,
 	if (!mutex_trylock(&cmd->lock))
 		return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
 
+	__clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
 	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&nbd->config_refs)) {
 		cmd->status = BLK_STS_TIMEOUT;
 		mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
@@ -730,6 +737,12 @@ static struct nbd_cmd *nbd_read_stat(struct nbd_device *nbd, int index)
 	cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
 
 	mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
+	if (!__test_and_clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags)) {
+		dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Suspicious reply %d (status %u flags %lu)",
+			tag, cmd->status, cmd->flags);
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto out;
+	}
 	if (cmd->cmd_cookie != nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle)) {
 		dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Double reply on req %p, cmd_cookie %u, handle cookie %u\n",
 			req, cmd->cmd_cookie, nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle));
@@ -833,6 +846,7 @@ static bool nbd_clear_req(struct request *req, void *data, bool reserved)
 
 	mutex_lock(&cmd->lock);
 	cmd->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
+	__clear_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
 	mutex_unlock(&cmd->lock);
 
 	blk_mq_complete_request(req);
@@ -968,7 +982,13 @@ static int nbd_handle_cmd(struct nbd_cmd *cmd, int index)
 	 * returns EAGAIN can be retried on a different socket.
 	 */
 	ret = nbd_send_cmd(nbd, cmd, index);
-	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+	/*
+	 * Access to this flag is protected by cmd->lock, thus it's safe to set
+	 * the flag after nbd_send_cmd() succeed to send request to server.
+	 */
+	if (!ret)
+		__set_bit(NBD_CMD_INFLIGHT, &cmd->flags);
+	else if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk),
 				    "Request send failed, requeueing\n");
 		nbd_mark_nsock_dead(nbd, nsock, 1);
-- 
2.31.1