[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0y0PhmOdMPnx10zG6s6RfiuC9Ju9s5SMnOk8oZ+cAFMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:11:50 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bert Vermeulen <bert@...t.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: Add basic support for Airoha EN7523 SoC
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:27 PM Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 20:52, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > Off-topic but related: Another MediaTek spin off, SigmaStar, seems to
> > > have done exactly the same thing. Cortex A53 chip running as a 32bit
> > > system to avoid having to fix their software. I'm interested to see if
> > > this makes it into arm or arm64. :)
> >
> > Maybe it's best to just add them to both at the same time? The boot
> > loader situation might take a bit to work out, but in theory this should
> > be fixable.
>
> I wonder how fixable it would be..
>
> I haven't gotten a board with the chip in question (SSD268G) yet but
> from looking at some firmware binaries I can see that even u-boot is a
> 6 year old 32bit version.
> As far as I can tell there's no PSCI, ATF etc that I think would be
> expected for an arm64 machine.
If the source code is available, creating a minimal PSCI implementation
in u-boot should be possible, and it would make it work well for both
32-bit and 64-bit kernels. There is no need for ATF here.
> I think the broken memory controller is still there so somehow I'd
> need to get the heavy barrier to work in arm64. I haven't yet worked
> out if that's even possible.
I think I missed that part of the discussion, or I forgot about it already.
What is the issue you are referring to here?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists