[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <250de8f97efe2458afc39f080c3ef6a55f42623c.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 18:08:31 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/sgx: Hook sgx_memory_failure() into mainline
code
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 15:03 +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > If I just #include <asm/sgx.h> in those files I'll break the build for other
> > > architectures.
> >
> > What does specifically break the build?
>
> There is no file named arch/arm/include/asm/sgx.h (ditto for other architectures that build memory-failure.c and einj.c).
>
> -Tony
Would it be too obnoxious to flag that include in those files?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists