linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/kvm: introduce per cpu vcpu masks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:34:57 -0400
From:   Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        maz@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/kvm: introduce per cpu vcpu masks

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:08:04PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In order to support high vcpu numbers per guest don't use on stack
> vcpu bitmasks. As all those currently used bitmasks are not used in
> functions subject to recursion it is fairly easy to replace them with
> percpu bitmasks.
> 
> Disable preemption while such a bitmask is being used in order to
> avoid double usage in case we'd switch cpus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - use local_lock() instead of preempt_disable() (Paolo Bonzini)
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c           | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c         |  9 +++++++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 3513edee8e22..a809a9e4fa5c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <linux/irq_work.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/local_lock.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> @@ -1591,6 +1592,15 @@ extern bool kvm_has_bus_lock_exit;
>  /* maximum vcpu-id */
>  unsigned int kvm_max_vcpu_id(void);
>  
> +/* per cpu vcpu bitmasks, protected by kvm_pcpu_mask_lock */
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(local_lock_t, kvm_pcpu_mask_lock);
> +extern unsigned long __percpu *kvm_pcpu_vcpu_mask;
> +#define KVM_VCPU_MASK_SZ	\
> +	(sizeof(*kvm_pcpu_vcpu_mask) * BITS_TO_LONGS(KVM_MAX_VCPUS))
> +extern u64 __percpu *kvm_hv_vp_bitmap;
> +#define KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS DIV_ROUND_UP(KVM_MAX_VCPUS, 64)
> +#define KVM_HV_VPMAP_SZ		(sizeof(u64) * KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS)

I have just realized that the Hyper-V sparse bitmap format can
support only up to 4096 CPUs, and the current implementation of
sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask() won't even work correctly if
KVM_MAX_VCPUS is larger than 4096.

This means vp_bitmap can't and will never be larger than 512
bytes.  Isn't a per-CPU variable for vp_bitmap overkill in this
case?

> [...]

-- 
Eduardo