[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTfcT1JUactPhwSA@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:40:31 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@...hat.com>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
casey.schaufler@...el.com,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
"Fields, Bruce" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Relax restrictions on user.* xattr
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:56:44PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 16:39, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <dgilbert@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > IMHO the real problem here is that the user/trusted/system/security
> > 'namespaces' are arbitrary hacks rather than a proper namespacing
> > mechanism that allows you to create new (nested) namespaces and associate
> > permissions with each one.
>
> Indeed.
>
> This is what Eric Biederman suggested at some point for supporting
> trusted xattrs within a user namespace:
>
> | For trusted xattrs I think it makes sense in principle. The namespace
> | would probably become something like "trusted<ns-root-uid>.".
>
> Theory sounds simple enough. Anyone interested in looking at the details?
So this namespaced trusted.* xattr domain will basically avoid the need
to have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in init_user_ns, IIUC. I guess this is better
than giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN in init_user_ns.
Vivek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists