linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210908090907.74edb3a4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:09:07 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:07:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (mips
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from /kisskb/src/include/linux/compiler_types.h:65:0,
>                  from <command-line>:0:
> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:29:29: error: "__GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_coverage__" is not defined [-Werror=undef]
>  # define __has_attribute(x) __GCC4_has_attribute_##x
>                              ^
> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:125:29: note: in expansion of macro '__has_attribute'
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KCOV) && __has_attribute(__no_sanitize_coverage__)
>                              ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   540540d06e9d ("kcov: add __no_sanitize_coverage to fix noinstr for all architectures")
> 
> This ia a gcc 4.9 build, so presumably this?
> 
> diff -ru a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h	2021-09-08 09:03:35.169225661 +1000
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h	2021-09-08 09:05:47.790907780 +1000
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_profile_instrument_function__ 0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___nonstring__           0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_address__ 1
> +# define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_coverage__	0
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___no_sanitize_undefined__ 1
>  # define __GCC4_has_attribute___fallthrough__         0
>  #endif

Just to be clear, I haven't tested the above in any way.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped