[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210908041310.4014458-1-jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:13:10 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH net] mctp: perform route destruction under RCU read lock
The kernel test robot reports:
[ 843.509974][ T345] =============================
[ 843.524220][ T345] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 843.538791][ T345] 5.14.0-rc2-00606-g889b7da23abf #1 Not tainted
[ 843.553617][ T345] -----------------------------
[ 843.567412][ T345] net/mctp/route.c:310 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
- we're missing the rcu read lock acquire around the destruction path.
This change adds the acquire/release - the path is already atomic, and
we're using the _rcu list iterators.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
---
net/mctp/route.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mctp/route.c b/net/mctp/route.c
index 5265525011ad..5ca186d53cb0 100644
--- a/net/mctp/route.c
+++ b/net/mctp/route.c
@@ -1083,8 +1083,10 @@ static void __net_exit mctp_routes_net_exit(struct net *net)
{
struct mctp_route *rt;
+ rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(rt, &net->mctp.routes, list)
mctp_route_release(rt);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static struct pernet_operations mctp_net_ops = {
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists