[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5853A0C4C064E51DCF58B71E8CD49@VI1PR04MB5853.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 08:46:47 +0000
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: imx: add compliance tests mode to enable measure
signal quality
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 4:34 PM
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
> Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> kernel@...gutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: imx: add compliance tests mode to enable
> measure signal quality
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 08.09.2021 um 14:59 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
> > Refer to the system board signal Quality of PCIe archiecture PHY test
> > specification. Signal quality tests can be executed with devices in
> > the polling.compliance state.
> >
> > To let the device support polling.compliance stat, the clocks and
> > powers shouldn't be turned off during the compliance tests although
> > the PHY link might be down.
> > Add the i.MX PCIe compliance tests mode enable option to keep the and
> > powers on, and finish the driver probe without error return.
> >
> > Use the "pcie_cmp_enabled=yes" in kernel command line to enable the
> > compliance tests mode.
>
> Adding "random" kernel command line options isn't going to fly. If at all, this
> should be a module_param so it gets properly namespaced. Also this needs a
> more descriptive name, right now this is abbreviating the one thing that would
> tell a user what this is about: compliance testing.
>
[Richard Zhu] Thanks a lot for your review comments.
Okay, I would use the module_param replace the command line option.
And Would add more compliance tests descriptions(what's compliance used for,
and the simple scope of the tests) later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 41
> > +++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > index 129928e42f84..3aef0e86f1c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> > #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN BIT(5)
> > #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN BIT(3)
> >
> > +static int imx6_pcie_cmp_enabled;
> > static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie); static
> > void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie);
> >
> > @@ -748,10 +749,12 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie
> *pci)
> > * started in Gen2 mode, there is a possibility the devices on the
> > * bus will not be detected at all. This happens with PCIe switches.
> > */
> > - tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > - tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > - tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > + if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_enabled) {
> > + tmp = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> > + tmp &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS;
> > + tmp |= PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB;
> > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, tmp);
> > + }
> >
> > /* Start LTSSM. */
> > imx6_pcie_ltssm_enable(dev);
> > @@ -812,9 +815,12 @@ static int imx6_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie
> *pci)
> > dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG0),
> > dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_DEBUG1));
> > imx6_pcie_reset_phy(imx6_pcie);
> > - imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > - if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0)
> > - regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > + if (!imx6_pcie_cmp_enabled) {
> > + imx6_pcie_clk_disable(imx6_pcie);
> > + if (imx6_pcie->vpcie
> > + && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0)
> > + regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie);
> > + }
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1010,6 +1016,17 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops
> imx6_pcie_pm_ops = {
> > imx6_pcie_resume_noirq)
> > };
> >
> > +static int __init imx6_pcie_compliance_test_enable(char *str) {
> > + if (!strcmp(str, "yes")) {
> > + pr_info("Enable the i.MX PCIe TX/CLK compliance tests mode.\n");
> > + imx6_pcie_cmp_enabled = 1;
> > + }
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +__setup("pcie_cmp_enabled=", imx6_pcie_compliance_test_enable);
> > +
> > static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -1187,8 +1204,16 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> >
> > ret = dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + if (imx6_pcie_cmp_enabled) {
> > + /* The PCIE clocks and powers wouldn't be turned off */
> > + dev_info(dev, "To do the compliance tests.\n");
>
> This needs a better message, like "Driver loaded with compliance test mode
> enabled" and the message needs to be shown unconditionally, not only when
> the host init fails. We don't want to have the user track down weird issues
> when the compliance test option was specified by accident and the link is
> almost working due to this.
>
[Richard Zhu] Thanks. Ok, got that, would update the message in next version.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
> > + ret = 0;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to add pcie port.\n");
> > + }
> > return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > if (pci_msi_enabled()) {
> > u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists