lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210908102300.GA4112@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:23:00 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        judyhsiao@...omium.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, plai@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        rohitkr@...eaurora.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        tiwai@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: lpass: add binding headers for
 digital codecs

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:08:33AM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> On 9/8/2021 1:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-09-06 06:27:34)

> > > +#define LPASS_CDC_DMA_VA0 8
> > > +#define LPASS_MAX_PORTS 9

> > Do we need LPASS_MAX_PORTS in the binding?

> Yes.  based on this creating array of streams in machine driver. So to make
> upper limit introduced this macro.

That's saying it's useful to have it in the code, do we need it in the
binding itself though?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ