[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bb91030-c4be-a3c1-fe25-337999348e9a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:07:29 +0800
From: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...nel.org,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, arnd@...db.de,
jasowang@...hat.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com, conghui.chen@...el.com,
stefanha@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On 2021/9/6 12:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> Let's let the dust settle on them then, then
>> resubmit?
> It doesn't break anything for now since we don't have much users and
> we know zero length transfers don't work. I will submit the necessary
> changes once spec is finalized.
Agree. The currently merged spec and driver are consistent.
We can support zero length request once the following spec change is
accepted.
[PATCH V3] virtio: i2c: Allow zero-length transactions
(https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202109/msg00004.html)
So, can we start a ballot for this new feature ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists