[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed21a6b0-be32-e00a-98c3-f25759a44071@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 06:57:09 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/mem: nowait zero/null ops
On 9/8/21 4:06 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Make read_iter_zero() to honor IOCB_NOWAIT, so /dev/zero can be
> advertised as FMODE_NOWAIT. This helps subsystems like io_uring to use
> it more effectively. Set FMODE_NOWAIT for /dev/null as well, it never
> waits and therefore trivially meets the criteria.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/mem.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
> index 1c596b5cdb27..531f144d7132 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
> @@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ static ssize_t read_iter_zero(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
> written += n;
> if (signal_pending(current))
> return written ? written : -ERESTARTSYS;
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
> + return written ? written : -EAGAIN;
> cond_resched();
> }
I don't think this part is needed.
> return written;
> @@ -696,11 +698,11 @@ static const struct memdev {
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEVMEM
> [DEVMEM_MINOR] = { "mem", 0, &mem_fops, FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET },
> #endif
> - [3] = { "null", 0666, &null_fops, 0 },
> + [3] = { "null", 0666, &null_fops, FMODE_NOWAIT },
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEVPORT
> [4] = { "port", 0, &port_fops, 0 },
> #endif
> - [5] = { "zero", 0666, &zero_fops, 0 },
> + [5] = { "zero", 0666, &zero_fops, FMODE_NOWAIT },
> [7] = { "full", 0666, &full_fops, 0 },
> [8] = { "random", 0666, &random_fops, 0 },
> [9] = { "urandom", 0666, &urandom_fops, 0 },
>
This looks fine.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists