lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163111620295.25758.18154572095175068828.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Wed, 08 Sep 2021 15:50:02 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Lukas Hannen" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lukas Hannen <lukas.hannen@...nsource.tttech-industrial.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/urgent] time: Handle negative seconds correctly in
 timespec64_to_ns()

The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     39ff83f2f6cc5cc1458dfcea9697f96338210beb
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/39ff83f2f6cc5cc1458dfcea9697f96338210beb
Author:        Lukas Hannen <lukas.hannen@...nsource.tttech-industrial.com>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:12:43 
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 17:44:26 +02:00

time: Handle negative seconds correctly in timespec64_to_ns()

timespec64_ns() prevents multiplication overflows by comparing the seconds
value of the timespec to KTIME_SEC_MAX. If the value is greater or equal it
returns KTIME_MAX.

But that check casts the signed seconds value to unsigned which makes the
comparision true for all negative values and therefore return wrongly
KTIME_MAX.

Negative second values are perfectly valid and required in some places,
e.g. ptp_clock_adjtime().

Remove the cast and add a check for the negative boundary which is required
to prevent undefined behaviour due to multiplication underflow.

Fixes: cb47755725da ("time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()")'
Signed-off-by: Lukas Hannen <lukas.hannen@...nsource.tttech-industrial.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR01MB541637BD6F336B8FFB72AF80EEC69@AM6PR01MB5416.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
---
 include/linux/time64.h |  9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/time64.h b/include/linux/time64.h
index 5117cb5..81b9686 100644
--- a/include/linux/time64.h
+++ b/include/linux/time64.h
@@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ struct itimerspec64 {
 #define TIME64_MIN			(-TIME64_MAX - 1)
 
 #define KTIME_MAX			((s64)~((u64)1 << 63))
+#define KTIME_MIN			(-KTIME_MAX - 1)
 #define KTIME_SEC_MAX			(KTIME_MAX / NSEC_PER_SEC)
+#define KTIME_SEC_MIN			(KTIME_MIN / NSEC_PER_SEC)
 
 /*
  * Limits for settimeofday():
@@ -124,10 +126,13 @@ static inline bool timespec64_valid_settod(const struct timespec64 *ts)
  */
 static inline s64 timespec64_to_ns(const struct timespec64 *ts)
 {
-	/* Prevent multiplication overflow */
-	if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
+	/* Prevent multiplication overflow / underflow */
+	if (ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
 		return KTIME_MAX;
 
+	if (ts->tv_sec <= KTIME_SEC_MIN)
+		return KTIME_MIN;
+
 	return ((s64) ts->tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) + ts->tv_nsec;
 }
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ