[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97f394d4-6538-a931-6531-063998c6c5e2@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:05:24 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/balloon: use a kernel thread instead a workqueue
On 9/8/21 11:11 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08.09.21 16:47, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given that wait_event_interruptible_timeout() is a bunch of nested macros do we need to worry here about overly aggressive compiler optimizing out 'credit = current_credit()'?
>
> I don't think so. current_credit() is reading from balloon_stats, which
> is a global variable. So the compiler shouldn't assume the contents
> won't change.
Ah, ok --- good point. Then I guess we should be fine.
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>
> But I can add a barrier() after 'credit = current_credit()' in case
> you'd feel uneasy without it.
>
>
> Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists