linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add pwm support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YTjuGVOmzkTot8z1@ripper>
Date:   Wed, 8 Sep 2021 10:08:41 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     skakit@...eaurora.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, swboyd@...omium.org,
        kgunda@...eaurora.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add pwm support

On Wed 08 Sep 08:29 PDT 2021, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:37:39PM +0530, skakit@...eaurora.org wrote:
> > On 2021-09-07 23:46, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:11:07PM +0530, satya priya wrote:
> > > > Add pwm support for PM8350C pmic.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@...eaurora.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > index e1b75ae..ecdae55 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
> > > >  			interrupt-controller;
> > > >  			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > >  		};
> > > > +
> > > > +		pm8350c_pwm4: pwm {
> > > 
> > > What does the '4' represent, an internal channel number? It should
> > > probably be omitted if the PM8350 only has a single output PWM
> > > port.
> > > 
> > 
> > pm8350c has four PWMs, but I think we can drop the '4' here.
> 
> Why is only one PWM exposed if the PMIC has for of them? Why number 4
> and not one of the others?

The node should represent all 4 channels, which ones the board uses is
captured in how they are bound to other clients - or defines as LEDs by
additional child nodes.

Regards,
Bjorn