Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDwOGu9kkMdXDx=+mGVGq_EmF0wgLen7hYO+VEy+j6rig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:04:02 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: Simplify ancestor enqueue loops

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 19:50, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
>
> When a task is enqueued or cfs_rq is unthrottled we have work to do from
> the cfs_rq in question possibly up to root. The important nodes on the
> path are throttled cfs_rqs or cfs_rqs already enqueud to their parent.
>
> Instead of multiple (interrupted) loops make all work in a single loop
> and decide what all needs to be done inside it. This undoes parts of

These multiple break loops have been done to make unthrottle_cfs_rq,
throttle_cfs_rq, enqueue_task_fair and dequeue_task_fair to follow the
same pattern and I don't see any good reason to break this

> commit 39f23ce07b93 ("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for
> leaf_cfs_rq list") but it should not bring any functional changes.
>
> Note some PELT stats update code is duplicated both in enqueue_entity
> and the ancestor loop (update_load_avg, se_update_runnable,
> update_cfs_group). It'd be nice to factor these out, however, the later
> parts of enqueue_entity rely on the updates, so stick with the current
> repetition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 9978485334ec..79f183336fa8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4883,6 +4883,7 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>         struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
>         struct sched_entity *se;
>         long task_delta, idle_task_delta;
> +       int enqueue = 1;
>
>         cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
>
> @@ -4911,29 +4912,21 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>         task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
>         idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running;
>         for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> -               if (se->on_rq)
> -                       break;
>                 cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -               enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> -
> -               cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
> -               cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta;
>
> -               /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
> -               if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
> -                       goto unthrottle_throttle;
> -       }
> -
> -       for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> -               cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -
> -               update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> -               se_update_runnable(se);
> +               if (se->on_rq)
> +                       enqueue = 0;
> +               if (enqueue)
> +                       enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> +               else {
> +                       update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> +                       se_update_runnable(se);
> +                       /* XXX: no update_cfs_group(se); */
> +               }
>
>                 cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
>                 cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta;
>
> -
>                 /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
>                 if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
>                         goto unthrottle_throttle;
> @@ -5537,6 +5530,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>         struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>         int idle_h_nr_running = task_has_idle_policy(p);
>         int task_new = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
> +       int enqueue = 1;
>
>         /*
>          * The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
> @@ -5555,27 +5549,18 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>                 cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
>
>         for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> -               if (se->on_rq)
> -                       break;
>                 cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -               enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
>
> -               cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
> -               cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_h_nr_running;
> -
> -               /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
> -               if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
> -                       goto enqueue_throttle;
> -
> -               flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> -       }
> -
> -       for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> -               cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -
> -               update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> -               se_update_runnable(se);
> -               update_cfs_group(se);
> +               if (se->on_rq)
> +                       enqueue = 0;
> +               if (enqueue) {
> +                       enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
> +                       flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP;
> +               } else {
> +                       update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> +                       se_update_runnable(se);
> +                       update_cfs_group(se);
> +               }
>
>                 cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
>                 cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_h_nr_running;
> --
> 2.32.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists