linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:48:38 +0200
From:   Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc:     habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 4:39 PM Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com> wrote:
> Patches LGTM, thanks for working on this.
>
> However, I would like to grumble a bit about process: firstly I would
>  have thought this was more net-next than net material.

I intended to send it for net-next, but by mistake I tagged it as net.
Sorry, my fault.

> Secondly and more importantly, I would really have liked to have had
>  more than 72 minutes to review this before it was applied.  Dave, I
>  realise you never sleep, but the rest of us occasionally have to :P

I go to sleep now too, or at least rest a bit  :-P
-- 
Íñigo Huguet