[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 17:03:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
Jinzhou Su <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] cpufreq: amd: introduce a new amd pstate driver to
support future processors
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:59:46PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> +static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> +{
> + u64 cap1;
> +
> + int ret = rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_AMD_CPPC_CAP1,
> + &cap1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Some AMD processors has specific power features that the cppc entry
> + * doesn't indicate the highest performance. It will introduce the
> + * feature in following days.
> + */
Wrong comment style; also imagine reading this comment half a year from
now...
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf, amd_get_highest_perf());
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, CAP1_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1));
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, CAP1_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1));
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, CAP1_LOWEST_PERF(cap1));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists